ssx291 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You have debunked all physics; plate tectonics, paleontology and even courses of orbit. Neal Adams you are a genius. With only some basic visuals and absolutely no scientific fact you have conned millions of mugs into believing you. Genuinely, I have loads of respect for your talent. Run for President, all they have to struggle to do is make people believe they actually care about their needs. Your theory is much harder to believe yet you still conned these simpletons.

nealadamsdotcom (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@soomeno - If you wish to know the full answer to this, you must read back a half dozen pages of comments carefully.

rongrite (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@soomeno The prime Matter Particle, is the container of the electron and the positron, before they are separated, by a cosmic ray. Creating 2 sister particles of stable matter. This is the only known way that matter can be created from an apparent nothing. And therefore, must be the initial starting point for the assembly of protons, neutrons and hydrogen atoms, and the higher count atoms, too. Large gravitational centers, transform prime matter into matter, that shows mass and volume.

soomeno (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I wonder where the extra mass comes from. "Prime matter" or something like that was what "experts" belleving in this say, but dont know what it is

nealadamsdotcom (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Gents. The Pacific's Rodinia spread apart 180 Million Years Ago, exactly at the Same time as the Atlantic began to rift into pieces. Before that, the Earth had differentiated a layers of molten Granitic CRUST! covering the Earth, as you would logically expect. Like Mars, the growing planet, EARTH'S Spreading sedimentary layers opened wide ridge systems. We see these ridges and lower plains all over Earth as on Mars. Finally the crust became too thick and rifted down to molten Basalt.

seansalvador1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@nealadamsdotcom Where is this matter and why does none of it date radiometrically to, for instance, yesterday?

seansalvador1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@nealadamsdotcom None of this addresses anything i have said.

seansalvador1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@nealadamsdotcom Right. So what difference do you suppose that would make to anything about which we have discussed so far?

seansalvador1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@nealadamsdotcom "Year must get longer and a Day longer as well. I say, Well, the two both happen." But the evidence says otherwise, and you circularly use each assumption as evidence of one another as i already pointed out without refutation. I will have to simply end this by using the same sophism you use IE ignore your questions and points and just post random, incoherent and unrelated nonsense.

seansalvador1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@sathearn "Can _you_ present their evidence against Earth expansion?" Of course, but what is the need? There is overwhelming evidence in the literature i have cited. In fact, none of this hypothesis even makes sense, for instance where exactly IS this new matter? Inside the Earth? If so, then why is it not found at the surface? There are so many holes it just doesn't bare any real scrutiny...