mitchellc407 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@cykocs99 Ok, you're dealing with a frame designed for a totally different caliber. Regardless of things "fitting" there are always pressure differences, and the fact that the parts you're putting in your gun were not made with your gun, therefore won't be perfect. I'd rather pay a few hundred more for that security. Its a cool idea, but if you're out to make it cheap, you're in the wrong hobby.

cykocs99 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@mitchellc407 its the fact for the cost of ammo, and the fact you can have a .357sig, 9mm, .40S&W with very low cost (less than that of another firearm). You ask "why", I ask "why not!!"

nedfan1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

That is pretty cool.

SuperRip7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

luv it

Gideon6640man (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

yes to which?..lol

mitchellc407 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@Argenix45 I reload, ammo prices aren't a huge deal.

Argenix45 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

good idea with the cost of ammo these days

Argenix45 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@mitchellc407 not when u can save money on ammo

Argenix45 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@Guerrero3919 u would wanna downgrade simply for cost of ammo

mitchellc407 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@Guerrero3919 That was what I was asking. However, going from 9mm to .40 isn't necessarily a downgrade; I'd have to get into math and physics that are far to complicated for my lazy ass to explain, but making a long story short, the caliber you should use depends on your needs/desires. My only concern with the conversion would be a possible reliability issue from decreased pressures, but I'm sure that GunWebsites has discussed/figured this out, they're quite knowledgeable.