|
garbulky (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I could hear the phase shift though I never knew such a thing existed! It got noticeably worse sounding around the halfway mark.
MrModulator (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Now that Neil Yong is trashing the CD-format saying that the DSD format with 2.8224 MHz (Yes, MEGAhz!!) sample frequency is needed this video is more important than ever.
Every self-proclaimed audiophile should see this workshop.
Heck, every musician should do his own A/B-tests with 96 or 88.2 Khz vs 44.1 Khz in his DAW.
With vst-i;s I can't spot any difference even using mydecent system between 96 and 44.1 Khz.
EthanWiner (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@MrYoorr Thanks. If you email me from my web site ethanwiner (dot) com I'll add you to the list of people to notify when it's available in April.
MrYoorr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Ethan, your Audio Expert book can't come soon enough. I'd like to have even a tiny bit of your expertise.
AndGz7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thank you , very useful info
ostgur (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I am always produce in Linear and render in 512 :)
Noahaddavis (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thanks for the video! I'm new to music production and this just saved me a ton of money I might have foolishly spent.
jasonhats (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Ethan Winer rocks!
EthanWiner (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@ent2186 The phase shift demo is set to 100% wet, so you hear only the phase shifted version. If it were 100% dry there'd be no effect, and anywhere in the middle would skew the frequency response. But I see what you mean, the way the control is labeled. It should say Dry/Wet.
ent2186 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So when your demonstrating the phase shift its set to dry... wet/dry and you have it on the right. Shouldn't it be on the left so we just hear the wet?? unless its inverted from the labeling... |
