|
lonly4uonly (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this was nice but i request u to add the role of tom, tim23/22 , sam ,oxa ,hsp in grearter detail... ignore the people who just add the comments for the sake.. you are awesome in explaining...
craksandwitches (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
she starts out talking about mRNA , like we know wtf that is , i think ppl here are trying to learn , and all we keep getting is bombarded with this textbook asscrap instead of real information , wtf , i just want a real documentary to help me learn about mitochondria that doesnt sound all monotone or put me to sleep or try to hard to be cool , thats all . what do you have to get nick bloomfeild up in here or what ,we need heather donahue up in here i mean please
fisher00769 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
How come I get into religious arguments when watching a video about the mitochondira? What the hell do you care about what other people believe? None of your business. You not christians leave the christians alone and let them believe whatever they want. You christians just leave the non believers alone and do not force them to believe what you do. Tell me why is it so fucking hard to do so?!
jairrrrrr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
there's even mistakes in there: Chaperonin is the wrong term, since chaperonins are only hsp60 chaperones... and hsp60 chaperones are not associated with mitochondrial transport. The right term is chaperone, since mainly hsp70 chaperones are involved in this process.
Thirdoptionisthename (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@TheEtceterist
The leap of faith you mention assumes quite an illogical backward motion, given the forward >> (and ultimately positive) moving motion of evolution...and jumping! From simplicity (1+1) comes complexity. Science may consider itself to be advanced, but the more we learn the more we have to learn! We've got, let's say a 10,000x zoom on these things. What will we learn when we have the ability to zoom in 1,000,000x?
What moves the cells, I ask? At a quantum, fundamental level..
taboosun (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Damn there is even the God debate here. Nice : )
elgalloxrs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@chrisbrownlvr23 fagget
Spastb00n (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
While I do not belive in god, I can clearly see, why some see this as "proof" of some sort of creator.
I am studying chemistry, and this really must be like a high-rise building in the desert, and some scientist standing next to it saying " I can't fully explain why this happened, but believe it or not, this thing built itself, no designer was involved"
Increadibly complex as it may be, I think that one day we will be able to explain this.
You're just making it easy by saying it was god.
heidijanc (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hi. I saw the commentary & found this conversation really interesting. I'm not replying to hate on you or tell anyone he/she is wrong. But I do believe in God and that He sent Jesus to save us after we chose to turn away because of free will. I guess all I want to say is, give God a chance. I know He loves you and delights in your curiosity. Nothing here is perfect but Him, that's why we can have hope :) He will never fail us; it's our own ideas of what "should" happen that we think he fails us
ColAbernathy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I accept your concession since you 'don't think it's worth' defending your own beliefs, so you either don't really hold them very strongly, or can't (or won't) come up with adequate counters. Your "list" wouldn't cover up the apparent cruelty and nastiness of your god, because they're IN THE BIBLE TOO. So you must ignore or "reinterpret" them as metaphor. Way to go! You've just shown that you can't back up your statement of god as creator, so you FAIL. Better luck next time! |
