|
leonetski (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
if anyone out there can reverse aging and make cell regeneration similar to a 20 yr old let me know...i know i did not create myself and i know there is nothing i can do to prevent death....humans are powerless
keemosobbee (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Notice how quick , atheists videos are & how fast they talk.To prevent thinkin about what they are saying. Notice how these atheists always insult your intelligence while they speak in their videos as if to peer pressure you into not wanting to be called 'not intelligent' according to their concept of intelligence. Notice the sarcastic spoiled brat tone of their voices similar to political gay rights activists' tone when a christian tell them Jesus died for them.
keemosobbee (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hey Video maker. your going to die one day. The God that you ask about who is his Intelligent designer , he does not have to face the death you will face. when you get there with him , ask him who made him.lmao
transtlantic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@xxMafia101
thing is...there are ONLY purely natural means..
ani1616 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Where did these molecules come frm though??/ i wanna know,evolution sounds dumber to me than Christianity,how did evolution know we needed eyes,hands,penis,foot,hair,a brain,heart,lungs,etc...how did it know someone please tell me, WE DONT KNOW EVERYTHING SOME PEOPLE JUST CANT ACCEPT THAT FACT,INSTEAD WE MAKE THEORIES.
hayesism (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Thrashaero "Tell me then, what is the purpose of denying the scientific consensus of climate change vs. every other unsolidified theory?"
I'll repeat: "I don't have selective scepticism; there are countless theories that I'm sceptical about."
There is also no such thing as a scientific consensus on climate change. There has never been any kind of poll to suggest that; it's an unsubstantiated claim disproved by the Oregon Petition, Leipzig Declaration, and SASGW.
hayesism (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Thrashaero What do fossil fuels have to do with armed services? Sure, they use them, but damn near every industry does. That's the biggest non-sequitur I've ever heard.
Lapdog for oil tycoons? Couldn't I just as easily tell you to be a lapdog for solar tycoons?
"maybe you're just stupid." I've addressed everything you've said, only I used proper punctuation and didn't resort to the tellingly weak "vested interests" argument. Or the new crown prince of stupid, the "go join the army" argument.
xxMafia101 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
0:27 You are correct on how the genetic code can evolve. We see proof in this based on the enviroment we grow up in. However, I would not say it evolves from purely natural means...
hayesism (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Thrashaero Fantastic. The second that solar power becomes cheaper than fossil fuels, I'll be the first to support it. I wouldn't continue to pay for the more expensive (ie, less efficient) fuel, that is retarded. By the same logic, it's retarded to support renewables that are more expensive today.
ValChronification (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Thrashaero ... subparts that interlock and function together to achieve goals, ala Irreducible Complexity. Design may be an illusion, but it's a strong one to our minds, and it *should* be entirely understandable to you why it takes hold with so many. But no, you'll continue to ridicule. I'm done with it. I understand that religious faith is intolerable, but the design vs evolution argument itself is fascinating. The tone adopted by you guys is just annoying as hell though. |
