|
88Astar88 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wow
08babymonster (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
IDK y this music makes me so happy!
AM I WEIRD ??
DjCoolz26 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This is Secular Renaissance music because it is not with the church because it is dance music. Contrapuntal textures in some of the songs, 2 or more melodies play. The rhythms are simple and easy to recognize. Viols are involved. This is Dance music. The first few songs have a Homophonic texture There also is a harpsichord playing in the song. Some of the composers of this song are Byrd, John Bull, Sweenlick
gregoryfox20 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
GREAT JOB!! You and those like you make youtube great.
ladyNiloriel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This is marvellous. I would love to attend a renaissance dance.
Sartinalexander (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
music for the soul
<3
Petraphage (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Joli !
J'aime bien votre interprétation du "Bransle du Chandelier"... mais pourquoi en avez-vous retiré la partie lente, au moment où les couples échangent le chandelier?
I like your interpretation of "Bransle du Chandelier"(candlestick dance) but why did you take off the slow part, where the couples are supposed to exchange the candlestick ?
delfia406 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@mxylpx
Maybe the people in those days had the same complains.. this was maybe a kind of modern rock to them..
drugycutter666 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
With the way they were dressed they would have all been royalty or high nobles, I would like to see how the peaseants would have dressed and danced as well as there choice in music but it seems as if that is lost to history with how little you can find
AvatarFanGirl28 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So.. pretty :'( I wish the world could go back to this kind of stuff.. Honestly wouldn't mind the dresses ^_^ |