|
wteddy18 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
euw, very very bad.. dont bother watching this..
silverback1972 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
To be honest, the end result shot seems rather under exposed. I liked the shot which the shooter said was too hot. All and all, I like the technique, but the shot itself is not anything memorable.
rezrocknj (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
where can I get that shirt you ware you have on?
nglstudios (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The picture is ok, its not like wow.
But it is a nice trick using glasses to make the background more interesting.
I just think the face is a little to dark or it might be my monitor :)
etherize (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yeah, this isn't very appealing. I wonder if the guys at the seminar got more out of it. Somehow I doubt it.
jigkrozroads (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this is just waste of time explaining & preparing, i really though the image would be spectacular. I can do better with this guy...
fjgindy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Have to agree with boiboi, skygonzo and and BX02 below. This is just insane, makes me dizzy and is a terrible and sloppy way to teach and see lighting. Purely by guessing and running back and forth.
And for a mere $139 you can have a lot more of the same on his 8 DVD set!. No thanks.
boiboi5 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wow. that guy is all over the place, like a scatter brain.
skygonzo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i agree. it sucked for the people who paid to be there ;-) i can do all that guessing for free....at home! |
